This chapter of
John-Steiner's book Creative Collaboration deals with the elementary school level problem
of 'just getting along' when it comes to complex personal/professional/creative
relationships. She takes both a feminist and a cultural-historical approach to analyzing several artistic and scientific
collaborations. The rest of the chapter is split up into sections:
Complementarity in Temperament, where she talks
about Marie and Pierre Curie among
others, and how two people with different but complementary personalities can
combine to support one another and make up for any personal shortcomings
The Gift of Confidence, where she states that
collaboration between two people also gives the individual a person that
believes in them- through this, the self-doubt that so often destroys a creator
can be pushed through. Given examples: Frida Kaloh and Diego Rivera, Jean-Paul
Sartre et Simone de Beauvoir.
Emotional Complementarity and Trust. How
prolonged exposure and work with a person can redevelop your personality- not
change it, just open parts that had been unused and make them stretch out a
bit. Ariel and Will Durant, the story of civilization
Collaborative Intimacy: its promise and dangers. Of course, the entire section is devoted to
Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. She labels points of tension in Plath's using
Hughes to fill 'sad holes' left in her
psyche by the death of her father, and in Hughes' unwillingness to confront his
wife's metal health in any way but as creative potential. She uses their
tragedy as a model to portray the negatives of collaboration when communication
is hindered; dangerous, toxic, lethal.
Issues of Intellectual Ownership and Inequality.
She gives the example of the authors of the book Women's
way of Knowing. The authors arranged their names in alphabetical order
on the book so as to not have to deal with the hierarchy apparent in academia;
they were subject to it anyways, always being referred to as 'Belenky, et al'
Here are some quotes of interest:
"The co-construction
of ideas is helped by a listening ear. Innovative works of literature, drama,
choreography, and art are nourished by emotional support. Building a resilient
sense of identity is aided by a self that is stretched and strengthened in a partnership."
"Another possibility
is that intimacy offers a solid foundation for an individual who is trying to
cope with her or her complexity. In effective, long-term relationships,
partners learn to adjust to each other's intensity and may be able to give each
other 'space' when the need for solitude arises. Intense collaborations are
frequently trans formative and can provide enormous intellectual and emotional
benefits to the participants. But when they become emotionally excessive and
splinter, the wounds inflicted by a traumatic ending may be long-lasting."
Thank you for this excellent summary!
ReplyDeleteI am arrested, of course, by the way you summarize Vera John-Steiner's comments on Plath and Hughes:
"She labels points of tension in Plath's using Hughes to fill 'sad holes' left in her psyche by the death of her father, and in Hughes' unwillingness to confront his wife's metal health in any way but as creative potential."
What an interesting analysis of Hughes's response to Plath's mental challenges. Perhaps he thought that her writing would give her a way of handling, and somehow shaping her depressions and anxieties. At the same time, I find her observation on his "unwillingness to confront" Plath's illness perceptive. Was he unwilling? was he afraid? Did he feel it was not really his place--that she had to learn to take charge of these health issues on her own? Imagine she had a recurrent physical disease--even cancer. Yes, such diseases can be a great challenge to intimate relationships, but not responding to them? That seems inconceivable to me.
I really like the break down of this book it really gives me a chance to look into and see the advantages and disadvantages to being in a relationship while writing together. Communication is the key to it all if people who just do more of it problems can be handled easier.
ReplyDelete